Search This Blog

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

130910

After the heavy sessions we've seen lately, Back squats were a welcomed sight. Even if we did need three reps. That third rep can be as elusive as snipe...

Back squat  3-3-3-3-3
                                 130817
John- 305
Derrick- 345
Todd McK- 135
Russell- 315                295
Eric- 250
Teresa- 150
Erin- 185
Tammy- 140
Abby- 125                  120
Kathryn- 135              130
Britt- 215                    185
Byron- 340
Dave- 135
Candice- 125
John M- 185
Sharon-105
Quincy- 135
Delaina- 105
Juan- 225
Tom- 205                   195

Great squats guys and gals! Monster numbers Derrick, Russell, Byron, and Erin. You are all super strong!

The more relaxed atmoshpere strength days bring to CFSF was also very welcomed, however, we left nothing on the table. All fuel spent. Just as gassed as any 'chipper' we have seen. Nice work everyone.

Back squats are polarizing. Some love them, some hate them. We do them because they are tried and true builders of strength, and CFHQ says to do them. While not as functional as the Front squat, most can manage heavier loads with the back rack.

Emphasis, as usual, was on form- and when it's on, you feel it. Most of us felt pretty good about the Back squats because everyone was dialed in on the targets we set: more hollow than extended positioning, heels, knees out, and most of all, range- everything was addressed. Thanks for that hard work and attention to detail!

www.trackmypr.com

Use the site. Track your progress.

Thanks for another great day of training and conditioning at CFSF.

Putin- 7
Obama- 0

CFSF

1 comment:

  1. Hahahahahaha, nice one on the Putin/Obama comment! I lol'd and lmao'd at the same damn time.

    ReplyDelete